Posts

The new CEO of Twitter is most probably a Muslim. He seems to be in support of jihad as well. This is what you are not going to read in any of the headlines popping up on the Interwebs following the news of Jack “Ban Trump” Dorsey stepping down from the CEO role at the far-left activist organization.

AN APOLOGIST FOR JIHAD?

Some publications on the right have correctly raised concerns about where Parang Agrawal sits on the ideological spectrum, pointing out a tweet he posted in 2010 basically trashing white people.

A writer at the Indian website India Today, (probably a Muslim himself), points out that the tweet was quoting Aasif Mandvi from The Daily Show. As if it matters whether it was an original thought or a quote. Aasif Mandi is also a Muslim. And if he was the one who made this statement originally, this tells you all you need to know about where he stands on Jihad as well.

But as bad as Twitter’s Agrawal’s racist remark is about white people, it’s as if no one is noticing what’s equally bad or maybe even worse – this statement is a de-facto apology for Jihad!

“If they are not gonna make a distinction between Muslims and jihadists…”

Parang Agrawal, CEO of Twitter

What is the difference, Mr. Agrawal? Is Twitter allowing a free discussion on the subject matter for us to have different opinions and takes on it, so we can better understand this complex issue? Not at all.

Twitter is banning people like Laura Loomer who criticize Islam but has no problem with pro-Jihadists like Linda Sarsour, Hamas and other terror groups on it. In fact, it has been reported that jihadists probably used Twitter as part of their tech toolkit at the time of the Taliban takeover of Kabul earlier this year. What’s the difference between the Taliban and non-Taliban Afghans? We don’t know. And we’ll never be able to learn if it was up to Twitter because Jack Dorsey, probably under the influence of the Jihadist apologist, now CEO Parang Agrawal.

CLUELESS ‘THEY’ REMAIN

But who are “they” who don’t understand the difference between Muslims and Jihadists? Does he mean all white people? All Westerners? All Americans?

The reality is that people in the US (or the West in general) are still not ‘getting’ what Islam is all about. Not if all they know about Islam comes from the incomplete education most have received when it comes to the true history of Islam. Had the true history of Islam and Jihad been taught proper in Western schools in the last several decades (or even before that), people today wouldn’t be so confused. And they would know that the difference between Jihadists and Muslims who aren’t pursuing Jihad boils down to how much a Muslim adheres to the Islamic doctrine or not. The more dedicated Muslims become to obeying the Islamic doctrine, the closer they match the profile of a terrorist. Furthermore, all Muslims support Jihad because all Mosques send money to Jihadist groups in one way or another.

For example, most Westerners (and people in the world in general) completely lack understanding of the genocide Islam has been perpetrating on India since the 8th century when it first attacked. This Jihad continues on until today. Scholars say that up to 400 million Indians might have been genocided by Muslims since 711 AD.

FOUR HUNDRED MILLION!

How many school books educate students about this part of history?

Don’t expect mainstream Western media to do a due diligence on Parang Agrawal any time soon! They are too busy celebrating his appointment as a great achievement of multiculturalism in the US. Anything and anyone daring to expose him as an apologist of Jihad, will no doubt be labeled as an “islamophobe” (fake far-left, pro-Jihadi propaganda label), banned from Twitter and probably from all other mainstream social media platforms. Could this be the reason conservative websites are playing it safe and are pointing out Agrawal’s anti-white racist remarks but won’t touch the pro-Jihadist element in this same statement? Just saying.

JIHAD IN OCTOBER OF 2010

Parang Agrawal is a tech genius, if the mainstream media is to be believed. Some of us think he’s a diversity hire. Oh, well. Whichever he is, he has access to information. Did he not know how many were the victims of Jihad in 2010 in October alone? According to the most authoritative source on this subject, TheReligionOfPeace.com, there were 121 Jihadist attacks in the first 20 days of October alone of that year alone!

That’s 366 innocent people who were killed by Jihadists and 508 wounded!

In 2010 there were 9,262 innocent people who were killed by Muslims and 17,470 wounded.

Does Parang Agrawal know these facts?

If yes, why is he making apologetic statements for Jihad? Only a Muslim who defends Jihad could think and act like this.

We can therefore make a safe bet that Parang Agrawal is a Muslim, that his wife and family are Muslim, that he was born and raised in a Muslim family and that he went to a Muslim school. Which basically means he has been an apologist for Islam his entire life, he probably has been donating money to Muslims organizations that funnel money to fund jihad, and that he will now use Twitter to extend these same influences in the United States and around the world.

Jack Dorsey has said that “Parag has been behind every critical decision that helped turn this company around.” This means he was behind the decision to ban Donald Trump, to allow Jihadists on Twitter and the banning of conservatives.

And now this same guy, a Muslim and an apologist of Islamic Jihad, is the CEO of one of the most influential US tech companies.

Orwell himself would be scratching his head if he was able to hear from the grave what the once great West has been turning into.

3
2

Indian journalist Ravi Shanker Kapoor has penned quite an accurate analysis of a paradigm shift that might be taking place in Europe after many years of Muslims waging jihad against innocent civilians. I say “might be” because we’ve heard Europe’s spineless politicians talk a lot in the past and do nothing about your next door Jihadi’s terror cell.

Sebastian Kurtz is indeed a God-sent given the seeming paralysis of the entire Western European system of governance in the face of an existential threat. With France and Austria getting hit hard during the latest jihadist attacks, the tide might be turning. We’ll see.

With a little bit of common sense, courage, and a survival instinct, it shouldn’t be too hard for Western European leaders to turn this little change of attitudes into an actual paradigm shift.

The leaders of Poland, Hungary and the Czech Republic have already demonstrated how this is done. It’s interesting how we don’t hear of any beheadings, FGM scandals or Muslim gang raping in these countries. Oh wait, could it be because there are hardly any Muslims there and even fewer mosques?

Hmm, this is so hard to figure out isn’t it?

Why do Indians understand the Islamic threat and why are they cheering leaders like Sebastian Kurtz? It’s because they know very well what Islam does to a people – Muslims began the subjugation of the Indian subcontinent in 711 CE and killed over 400 million Hindus over the course of 1,000 years – the greatest genocide in human history. Sadly, most Europeans and Americans remain ignorant of Islam’s bloody history and crimes against humanity.

George


Here’s Ravi Shanker Kapoor’s article:

Sebastian Kurz’s fight against radical Islam signifies Europe’s Rightward turn

New Delhi, Nov 14 (IANS): Austrian Chancellor Sebastian Kurzs resolve to take on radical Islam, close on the heels of French President Emanuel Macrons tough stand against Islamic terrorism, signifies a change of mood in European politics.

The entire continent has suffered Muslim fundamentalists for decades, their cantankerousness and vehemence growing over the years. Till some time ago, anybody standing up to them was vilified by the mainstream media and intellectuals as racist and Islamophobic. The anti-jihad politicians and writers were denounced as far-Right — a wide-spectrum term of denunciation. That is changing now.

The Austrian cabinet has “agreed on a wide range of anti-terrorism measures meant to plug perceived security flaws identified after a deadly attack by an Islamic extremist in Vienna last week,” the Daily Mail reported.

“The proposals include the ability to keep individuals convicted of terror offences behind bars for life, electronic surveillance of people convicted of terror-related offenses upon release and criminalising religiously motivated political extremism,” the report said.

“Kurz said the measures, which will be brought before parliament in December for a vote, take a two-pronged approach, targeting both terror suspects and also the ideology that drives them.”

Had a European head of government made such an announcement five years ago, he would have been hauled over the coals by the opposition, MSM, and other opinion makers — not just in his or her own country but all across the world. Kurz has been spared such opprobrium, for the mood vis-a-vis radical Islam has changed.

People and, more importantly, top politicians no longer believe that Muslim terrorists are impoverished, ‘alienated’ youth who murder innocent people because of racism. Of course, editorialists of several MSM organisations still peddle this pernicious theory, but it finds few subscribers.

Macron has surely signed off from the subscription, much to the chagrin of Islamists like Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan and Pakistani Prime Minister Imran Khan.

They reacted violently, with Erdogan taunting that his French should get “his mental health tested.” He also called for the boycott of French products.

Khan tweeted, “Sadly, President Macron has chosen to deliberately provoke Muslims, including his own citizens, and encouraged the display of blasphemous cartoons targeting Islam and the Holy Prophet (Muhammad).”

German Chancellor Angela Merkel — who refused to acknowledge the menace that radical Islam is — too has seen the light. She backed Macron.

Her spokesman said, “They are defamatory comments (by Erdogan and Khan) that are completely unacceptable, particularly against the backdrop of the horrific murder of the French teacher Samuel Paty by an Islamist fanatic.”

Interestingly, public intellectuals were supportive of Macron and Merkel in the past, as they though that the two leaders were bulwarks against rising tide of far-Right politics.

Even Kurz was approved by The Washington Post as a conservative leader who had “reinvented himself” by shunning his more Rightwing political associates.

“Austria’s 33-year-old Sebastian Kurz appears set to become the youngest head of government in the world — for the second time — after his conservative party and the Austrian Green party announced a coalition agreement on Wednesday,” the newspaper wrote on January 2 this year (https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2020/01/02/world-is-likely-get-new-youngest-government-leader-hes-familiar-face/).

Kurz became Austrian chancellor for the first time at 31 in 2017, but lost office when a scandal triggered a breakup with his far-right coalition partner last May.

“Seven months on, however, Kurz has reemerged and reinvented himself. Whereas in 2017 he was criticised for undermining European values with his embrace of the far right, he is now being hailed as the leader of a liberal-conservative political experiment that could be repeated elsewhere on the continent,” The Washington Post wrote.

In other words, the liberal establishment regards Kurz as a regular leader. He is certainly no Marine Le Pen or Geert Wilders, who could be conveniently dismissed as Islamophobes.

In short, it is not the Right in Europe that has been mainstreamed; mainstream politics has turned Rightward. This is one bit of good news in this dreadful year.

Source: http://www.daijiworld.com/news/newsDisplay.aspx?newsID=771558