30 years deep into the islamophobia propaganda era, spineless Western governments who have sold out to globalism continue to pander to global jihad. The UK Government even appointed an imam as a “minister of islamophobia” as if it were. And yes, they had the arrogance to call him ‘independent”. But how can they do that, all of us rational people keep asking ourselves? It’s because they are SHAMELESS! But what does this really mean? All this and more in the new podacst episode.
Indian journalist Ravi Shanker Kapoor has penned quite an accurate analysis of a paradigm shift that might be taking place in Europe after many years of Muslims waging jihad against innocent civilians. I say “might be” because we’ve heard Europe’s spineless politicians talk a lot in the past and do nothing about your next door Jihadi’s terror cell.
Sebastian Kurtz is indeed a God-sent given the seeming paralysis of the entire Western European system of governance in the face of an existential threat. With France and Austria getting hit hard during the latest jihadist attacks, the tide might be turning. We’ll see.
With a little bit of common sense, courage, and a survival instinct, it shouldn’t be too hard for Western European leaders to turn this little change of attitudes into an actual paradigm shift.
The leaders of Poland, Hungary and the Czech Republic have already demonstrated how this is done. It’s interesting how we don’t hear of any beheadings, FGM scandals or Muslim gang raping in these countries. Oh wait, could it be because there are hardly any Muslims there and even fewer mosques?
Hmm, this is so hard to figure out isn’t it?
Why do Indians understand the Islamic threat and why are they cheering leaders like Sebastian Kurtz? It’s because they know very well what Islam does to a people – Muslims began the subjugation of the Indian subcontinent in 711 CE and killed over 400 million Hindus over the course of 1,000 years – the greatest genocide in human history. Sadly, most Europeans and Americans remain ignorant of Islam’s bloody history and crimes against humanity.
George
Here’s Ravi Shanker Kapoor’s article:
New Delhi, Nov 14 (IANS): Austrian Chancellor Sebastian Kurzs resolve to take on radical Islam, close on the heels of French President Emanuel Macrons tough stand against Islamic terrorism, signifies a change of mood in European politics.
The entire continent has suffered Muslim fundamentalists for decades, their cantankerousness and vehemence growing over the years. Till some time ago, anybody standing up to them was vilified by the mainstream media and intellectuals as racist and Islamophobic. The anti-jihad politicians and writers were denounced as far-Right — a wide-spectrum term of denunciation. That is changing now.
The Austrian cabinet has “agreed on a wide range of anti-terrorism measures meant to plug perceived security flaws identified after a deadly attack by an Islamic extremist in Vienna last week,” the Daily Mail reported.
“The proposals include the ability to keep individuals convicted of terror offences behind bars for life, electronic surveillance of people convicted of terror-related offenses upon release and criminalising religiously motivated political extremism,” the report said.
“Kurz said the measures, which will be brought before parliament in December for a vote, take a two-pronged approach, targeting both terror suspects and also the ideology that drives them.”
Had a European head of government made such an announcement five years ago, he would have been hauled over the coals by the opposition, MSM, and other opinion makers — not just in his or her own country but all across the world. Kurz has been spared such opprobrium, for the mood vis-a-vis radical Islam has changed.
People and, more importantly, top politicians no longer believe that Muslim terrorists are impoverished, ‘alienated’ youth who murder innocent people because of racism. Of course, editorialists of several MSM organisations still peddle this pernicious theory, but it finds few subscribers.
Macron has surely signed off from the subscription, much to the chagrin of Islamists like Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan and Pakistani Prime Minister Imran Khan.
They reacted violently, with Erdogan taunting that his French should get “his mental health tested.” He also called for the boycott of French products.
Khan tweeted, “Sadly, President Macron has chosen to deliberately provoke Muslims, including his own citizens, and encouraged the display of blasphemous cartoons targeting Islam and the Holy Prophet (Muhammad).”
German Chancellor Angela Merkel — who refused to acknowledge the menace that radical Islam is — too has seen the light. She backed Macron.
Her spokesman said, “They are defamatory comments (by Erdogan and Khan) that are completely unacceptable, particularly against the backdrop of the horrific murder of the French teacher Samuel Paty by an Islamist fanatic.”
Interestingly, public intellectuals were supportive of Macron and Merkel in the past, as they though that the two leaders were bulwarks against rising tide of far-Right politics.
Even Kurz was approved by The Washington Post as a conservative leader who had “reinvented himself” by shunning his more Rightwing political associates.
“Austria’s 33-year-old Sebastian Kurz appears set to become the youngest head of government in the world — for the second time — after his conservative party and the Austrian Green party announced a coalition agreement on Wednesday,” the newspaper wrote on January 2 this year (https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2020/01/02/world-is-likely-get-new-youngest-government-leader-hes-familiar-face/).
Kurz became Austrian chancellor for the first time at 31 in 2017, but lost office when a scandal triggered a breakup with his far-right coalition partner last May.
“Seven months on, however, Kurz has reemerged and reinvented himself. Whereas in 2017 he was criticised for undermining European values with his embrace of the far right, he is now being hailed as the leader of a liberal-conservative political experiment that could be repeated elsewhere on the continent,” The Washington Post wrote.
In other words, the liberal establishment regards Kurz as a regular leader. He is certainly no Marine Le Pen or Geert Wilders, who could be conveniently dismissed as Islamophobes.
In short, it is not the Right in Europe that has been mainstreamed; mainstream politics has turned Rightward. This is one bit of good news in this dreadful year.
Source: http://www.daijiworld.com/news/newsDisplay.aspx?newsID=771558
John Thompson is running for the Minnesota House District 67A and just won the August 11, 2020 Democrat primaries.
Thompson has been endorsed by the Democrat Governor of Minnesota Tim Walz and other Democrat politicians including Betty McCollum. The Somali Hoda Hassan has called him “my brother”. Why is she calling him “my brother”? Is he a Muslim?
Thompson’s campaign website also shows a picture of him and Keith Ellison, another high-profile Minnesota Muslim.
Recently John Thompson picketed the home of Lt. Bob Kroll, President of the Minneapolis Police Federation. In his racist rant laced with obscenities, he went as fast as calling Bob Kroll “a grand wizard” and “a klansman”, ending it with “if the people in Hugo, Minnesota won’t support black people, fuck Hugo, Minnesota”. A Black Lives Matter has threatened that they will harass Lt. Bob Kroll and his family by picketing his home again in the future.
Here’s the same meltdown from another angle – the whole thing! That’s one angry thug right there. Will the Democrats withdraw their endorsements of him?
The Republican candidate for 67A John Stromenger has no web presence and doesn’t seem to be a serious challenger, which almost but guarantees the Black Lives Matter activist John Thompson a win in the November 2020 Minnesota elections. The Minnesota Democrat Party is becoming more radicalized with each election with more radical leftist and islamist candidates entering races, advancing to elections, and winning seats.
The trial of one Al Hassan Ag Abdoul Aziz Ag Mohamed Ag Mahmoud, a well-known jihadist from Mali who was part of the Al-Queda invasion of Timbuktu during the Obama era (2012), has begun. The International Criminal Court in the Hague committed him to trial in September of 2019 finding sufficient grounds for prosecution of Ag Mahmoud for crimes against humanity between April 2012 and January 2013: Torture, rape, sexual slavery, other inhumane acts, including, inter alia, forced marriages, persecution, intentionally directing attacks against buildings dedicated to religion and historic monuments.
It’s remarkable to see how The Guardian coverage whitewashes Al Hassan’s image but this is hardly a surprise. The Guardian’s Jason Burke refers to the jihadist simply as “an extremist fighter”. Perhaps Mr. Burke has met many “moderate fighters” around the world? Calling Al Hassan a “jihadist” is obviously unthinkable when it comes to the Guardian which has earned itself the well deserved reputation of a mouthpiece for the Left.
Why is the Left always busy with whitewashing the public image of Islam and global jihad? It most probably has to do with the fact that the Left is an essential partner in the Red-Green Axis defined by the Center for Security Policy as “an ad hoc collaboration among global forces whose common objective is the destruction of Western Civilization”, the forces being the Marxist left (the “Red”) and the global Islamic Movement (the “Green”). To learn more about the Red-Green Axis, check out Jim Simpson’s book “The Red-Green Axis 2.0: An Existential Threat to America and the World”
Back to the Mali jihadist story. Nowhere in the entire article does Mr. Burke even mention the word jihad. The pictures of the jihadist have been carefully curated and show him in a suit, looking like just another guy in his 40s wearing a suit. After all, we’re all flawed human beings right? Well, some of us get little carried away and rape, murder, mutilate, torture and force women into sexual slavery in the name of Islam. But hey, look at him, he’s just a normal looking guy, right?
Wrong.
Based on court documents Al Hassan was in fact the chief of the Islamic Sharia Police and Islamic Sharia Court: murdering, raping, forcing women into sexual slavery, and passing “sentences” while in power. All of which was done in accordance with and in the name of Islam! Which is what Muslims have been doing in the name of Islam since Islam’s inception in the 7th century.
But let’s not sound so “islamophobic”! Phobia from what? Islam? The ideology that was the sole reason this jihadi in Mali to rape, murder, torture and chop a few hands? Oh, let’s not exaggerate now. Some people did some things. That’s all. Not a big deal. There aren’t more than 7% of Muslims who are “extremists” and subscribe to the traditional jihadist form of Islam. That would be only over 100 million such fellas plotting day in and day out how to perpetrate on us Shaira “law” through terror.
What’s there to be Islamophobic about?
To the Guardian as a good leftist publication the jihadists are only “extremists”. Which is simply another way to push the idea that there’s nothing wrong with Islam itself, it’s just that “few extremists” have taken it a bit too far.
Coverage of the exact same story looks very different from the website of the French press agency AFP. Al Hassan is called a jihadist in the very headline as well as several other times in the news article itself. It is the AFP coverage the majority of African news sources have chosen to cite. Media outlets in Sub-Saharan Africa aren’t mincing words when it comes to Islam and Jihad. People there know way too well what Islam has been doing to them for centuries. Al Hassan is pictured in his Islamic garb, clearly showing his real identity as a Muslim.
It’s worth noting that France has officially banned Islamic head coverings in public. France was the first European country in modern times to ban public wearing of the full-face veil. A Muslim woman challenged this law in the European Court of Human Rights but the Court upheld the law and it remains the law of the land to this day. In 2011 Belgium adopted a similar ban. In Spain, the city of Barcelona and some other towns have brought in similar bans, as have some towns in Italy. No such general ban applies in the UK.
Al Hassan is only the second jihadist to appear before the ICC in the Hague. His case is however the first one to include charges of crimes typical of jihad throughout history, among which:
“Al Hassan played an essential and undeniable role in the system of persecution established by the armed groups… in Timbuktu,” ICC chief prosecutor Fatou Bensouda said last year.
The jihadist police imposed draconian measures on the city’s residents who lived in constant fear of “despicable” violence and repression, prosecutors said.
They cited an example in which a man had his hand amputated after he was accused of petty theft.
Why is the Left so hard at work on behalf of their partners, the jihadists? Why don’t they want us to hear about what Sharia Law is all about and what happens to the “infidels” when Muslims take Islam’s doctrines literally? Could it be because this is exactly what the likes of HAMAS d.b.a. CAIR are all about? When the jihadists remove their suits, there’s a suicide vest strapped on each one of them. Which is why the Left is so diligent to alter the public perception of Islam and global jihad. The Left needs the numbers that Muslims can offer. The Muslims need the Left to legitimize the in the West.
We’ll keep you posted on new developments surrounding this historic case. Our analysis will always dissect the tactics of the Red-Green Axis, pointing you to relevant resources in an effort to help you understand better what this current civilization conflict between Islam and the free world.
Islamophobia Watch (c) 2020
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
On June 15 a Somali website called the Sahan Journal informed the world that one Anisa Hajimumin has been appointed to lead “a new state office”. Appears as if Anisa will be an “assistant commissioner for immigrant and refugee affairs”. Thanks to this report by KSTP from February 2020, it becomes clear that Anisa will be getting paid up to $142,000 a year.
From the Sahan post we learn that Anisa is a gender studies and creative writing Hamling graduate who somehow became “an entrepreneur and an activist”. No word what her “entrepreneurship” was about. Oh wait, we do know. Thanks to this Wikipedia page we learn that she worked as a paralegal and then founded some NGO…a non-profit called “Hajimumin & Associates”, focused on designing workshops for youth development and women’s empowerment. And there you have it! That’s a nice entrepreneurial story, isn’t it? I’m sure the financials of the non-profit will be a very interesting part of the story to look into. Maybe later.
Now to all of you islamophobes, you must be tempted to think “What in the world is going on here?”
Stop! Don’t you think for a minute you can use your brain to weigh in on what makes sense in this story and what doesn’t. There’s a higher cause here, don’t you get it, infidel? We’re fighting Islamophobia here in Minnesota. How inappropriate of you to try to do the math…to think “wait I thought entrepreneur meant someone who creates economic activity and value”? See, this is your barbaric, profit-obsessed, capitalist pig mind working now. Anisa has shown us a higher way to higher income. Watch and learn!
While managing her NGO and being an activist, Anisa managed to also write a book about Somali women and their issues.
Wait, women issues where, in Somalia? Or in America? Most probably in Somalia because this same woman, Anisa, now under a different last name: Haj Mumin, was in fact appointed as an official in the Somali government in 2014! Her position? She was the Minister of Women Affairs!
No word on how long she served as the Minister of Women Affairs in Somalia. Is she still an acting minister? What did she achieve while in office there? Minnesota media should be asking these questions. As usual they aren’t.
Are you getting the picture islamophobes?
This individual was born in Somalia, lived in Minnesota long enough to graduate gender studies (supposedly), became a paralegal, became the founder of a non-profit (we’ll look into the non-profit later), then a minister in the Somalia government as recent as 2014. Six years later this same woman is appointed in Minnesota government by the Walz administration with a $142,000 annual salary to basically teach third world transplants how to work the system. After all she is a shining example of how you can be a minister in the Somali government and in the Minnesota government.
She seems to be as good as Ilhan “Omar” Elmi. In fact the next logical step for would be Minnesota politics. After all, someone needs to fight even harder for all these oppressed minorities who suffer terrible racism and Islamophobia in Minnesota.
Isn’t this clear as day from the story you just read?
The pro-jihadist Emperor of Turkey, Erdogan, has ordered the museum Hagia Sophia to be turned into a functioning mosque again. The mosque was originally built as a Christian church in the 6th century AD to be the main church of the Eastern Roman Empire’s capital city Constantinople. It was considered the largest dome in the world for 1,000 years.
In 1453 Constantinople fell and the church was converted into a mosque.
But hey, don’t be an ‘islamophobe’! It’s okay for churches to be converted to mosques. However, mosques cannot be converted to churches under no circumstances. That would be ‘islamophobic’, right? Or at least this is how the jihadists would want us to feel about their plan to islamize the world. They want Western people to obsess about ‘tolerance’, even while killing Christians and Jews in the name of the ‘religion of peace’.
Kemal Ataturk, the founder of the Republic of Turkey, converted The Hagia Sophia mosque into a museum as a gesture of good will to Christians. There are thousands of mosques in Istanbul where Muslims can pray. Thus, converting the mosque into a museum was a symbolic act of ending the era of the caliphate and putting the jihadist past behind Turkey.
Now a Turkish court has reversed this 1934 decision and the museum will begin functioning as a mosque once again. Clearly this is again a symbolic act showing the return of Islam as a world power.
But hey, don’t be Islamophobic! And remember Islam isn’t an ideology, it’s only a ‘religion’. So rest assured, this reviving of a museum into a mosque is nothing to be worried about. Because as we know Islam is the religion of ‘peace’. Except if you refuse to submit to it, of course. Then it becomes the religion of bloodshed and terror.
The AP reports: “There was jubilation outside the terracotta-hued structure with its cascading domes and four minarets. Dozens of people awaiting the court’s ruling chanted “Allah is great!” when the news broke. A large crowd later prayed outside it. In the capital of Ankara, legislators stood and applauded as the decision was read in Parliament.”
But don’t worry, there’s nothing to see here. Just some jihadists in suites chanting Allahu Akbar. But don’t be an islamophobe. The media said so.
Now here’s a curious thought – what would happen if we began to convert mosques into churches? An uproar from the Left? Accusations of “racism”? One has to wonder just how far are people in the West are willing to go before they wake up and realize this is war and we’re currently losing it as it is.
Follows us on old and new social media