To mark the 100th anniversary of the Balfour Declaration, Mahmoud Abbas, the Chairman of the Palestinian Authority published an op-ed in the British Guardian newspaper. After castigating Lord Balfour for promising “a land that was not his to promise” he went on to describe the Palestinian people as “a proud nation with a rich heritage of ancient civilizations, and the cradle of the Abrahamic faiths.” [The Guardian, Nov. 1, 2017]

Contradicting Abbas’ historical revision, just a day before, PA official TV broadcast an interview with the historian Abd Al-Ghani Salameh, who explained that in 1917 there was no Palestinian people.

During the broadcast, the host of the program asked:

“There always was a historical struggle over Palestine, and many wanted to rule it. How did the aspirations to rule affect the Palestinian existence, the Palestinians’ options, and the Palestinians’ possibilities of development?”

Salameh responded:

Such an islamophobic thing to say!

“Before the Balfour Promise (i.e., Declaration) when the Ottoman rule ended (1517-1917), Palestine’s political borders as we know them today did not exist, and there was nothing called a Palestinian people with a political identity as we know today, since Palestine’s lines of administrative division stretched from east to west and included Jordan and southern Lebanon, and like all peoples of the region [the Palestinians] were liberated from the Turkish rule and immediately moved to colonial rule, without forming a Palestinian people’s political identity.”
[Official PA TV, Nov. 1, 2017]

The Balfour Declaration of Nov. 2, 1917 was a letter from British Foreign Secretary Arthur Balfour to Baron Rothschild stating that “His Majesty’s government views with favour the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people.” In 1922, the League of Nations adopted this and made the British Mandate “responsible for putting into effect the declaration,” which led to the UN vote in 1947 and the establishment of the State of Israel.

The Ottoman rule of the area started in 1512 and lasted for over 400 years.

Source: https://palwatch.org/page/13209

The picture is becoming clearer by the day. This may explain why Joseph Biden has been treating the Taliban jihadists as allies, leaving behind for them more weapons systems that what some actual NATO member countries possess. It’s because what Turkey has probably been working on for a long time: make the Taliban an ally to America and the West!

The following is from the Turkish website cumhuriyet.com:

Abdulkahhar Balki from the Taliban Cultural Commission, who answered the questions of Mehmet Akif Ersoy from HaberTürk TV, made a call to Turkey.

Balki said, “Turks are our Muslim brothers. We share a great history and a wide culture. We have many common points such as religion. We want to cooperate with Turkey and Turkish people in diplomatic, economic and other fields.”

“We ensured security in Afghanistan. No crimes are currently committed. The Taliban are also working through an inclusive system for Afghanistan. People were exposed to a propaganda about us. The whole image of the Islamic Emirate has been distorted to the world.

When the Taliban first emerged, its aim was to bring stability. People’s wealth and dignity were not secure. Also, I don’t believe the first picture given at that time is correct. Because there weren’t many tools like social media.

We are working on a program on Islamic law in Afghanistan. Every government sets new strategies. We also gained a lot of experience from our past management. Also, in our previous administration, there was no restriction on women’s employment.

Our policy regarding Turkish forces is clear. We think we can ensure the security of our own country. All foreign forces in Afghanistan are the same to us. Turks are our Muslim brothers. We share a great history and a broad culture. We have a lot in common, such as religion. We want to cooperate with Turkey and Turkish people in diplomatic, economic and other fields.”

Hey, infidels and islamophobes, can you say NIRVANA?

Or, SHARIA?

Can you see what they are pushing here?

Can anyone remember how hard the Soviets worked to sell America and the West the idea that there were no human rights violations in the USSR? The same thing China has been doing. The same thing the “Palestinians” are doing. The same thing ALL terrorist Communist and Muslim states do. Move over, make room for the newest member of the club. They have been schooled by the best probably – the Obamas, the Clintons and the Bidens of the world!

Now who do you think might be against such wonderful, utopian goals and rhetoric by the Taliban jihadis? All of you wicked islamophobes, who else? Who do you think will want you to shut up and not oppose the amazing peace being offered by these “religion-of-peace” operators? The administration of Joseph Biden of course! The same guy who vowed on the campaign trail that once in office he will make Islam mainstream in America. Get ready to see “islamophobic” content deleted from the internet much like content challenging the official Covid-19 totalitarian “scientists” line. That was just a grand rehearsal to introduce you to getting comfortable with face coverings and censorship.

George

The propagandists are at it again! The other day it was the “Taliban”.

Today it’s “ISIS-K”!

Thirteen Marines were just killed, dozens others have been injured, but the media is busy throwing at us new, fancy code words in their desperate last effort to conceal the truth: Jihadist all over the world are out to destroy us in the name of the same book, the same non-existent “deity”, and the same 7th century murderous, child-raping goat herder, if he ever existed.

In Nigeria they call them the “Fulani”. In Myanmar they are the “Rohingya”. In China it’s the “Uighur”. In Israel it’s the “Palestinians”.

Stop the spin! Enough propaganda and mind games!

They are all cut from the same cloth. They are all Muslims and they are all part of the agenda of global jihad.

This is the truth the globalist propaganda machine doesn’t want you to hear. Why? Because they don’t want you to connect the dots. They want to be the sole authority on this subject matter and they definitely want to control the narrative. They want you dependent on their “experts”, talking heads, government spokesmen and don’t forget, their “journalists”. They are on somebody’s payroll and their job is to translate and interpret for you how Islam is all about peace. Even when they are chopping hands and heads off.

They are terrified at the prospects of you and I figuring out the simple and most obvious fact: Jihad, produced exclusively by the matrix of Islam, is one of the greatest existential threats to the civilized world as we know it.

Stop the spin! Enough propaganda and mind games!

They are all cut from the same cloth. They are all Muslims and they are all part of the agenda of global jihad.

 

Oh, no! But we thought the Uighur were all innocent victims of China’s genocide?

Yes, I know. I knew this would come up in the minds of most people the minute I decided to list them as part of the gang.

Sorry to burst yet another one of your propaganda bubble, jihadists!

The truth is that all of these groups with quirky names are fundamentally stemming from the same root, they are part of the same agenda, the obey the same terrorist manual, they worship the same 7th century pedophile – if he ever even existed.

That’s right, the Uighurs aren’t the innocent martyrs the jihadist narrative controlled media would have you believe.

Now, I’m sure the Chinese are killing innocents among the Uighur. After all, the ruthless Chinese Communists have been killing tens of millions of innocents of their own people, let alone the Uighur.

But why isn’t “the media”, i.e. the despicable clowns who fabricate stories meant to confuse you, why are aren’t they telling us the full story on the Uighur?

According to a report* by Colin P. Clarke, Ph.D. in international security policy from the University of Pittsburgh, and Paul Rexton Kan, Associate Professor of National Security Studies and the Henry L. Stimson Chair of Military Studies at the US Army War College, the Uighur story has a “little” more to it than what you’ve been led to believe.

“Uighurs, specifically individuals of Turkic decent from China’s northwest province of Xinjiang, have become a noticeable part of the constellation of globally active jihadist terror groups. Uighur jihadists first came to the world’s attention when the United States and its allies invaded Afghanistan in 2001. While continuing their cooperation with the Taliban under the banner of the East Turkestan Islamic Movement (ETIM), Uighur jihadists have now spread to Southeast Asia and the Middle East. ETIM’s members are part of the Turkestan Islamic Party fighting with the Al-Qaeda umbrella group in Syria, but other Uighurs have joined IS in Syria and Iraq, and still others have joined local terror groups in Indonesia. However, Uighurs are currently underexamined as active participants in jihadist organizations. Publications about Uighurs have been piecemeal – focusing on their struggles against the Chinese government or narrowly describing the specific groups in which Uighurs have been participants. This Policy Brief explores the scope and scale of Uighur Foreign Fighters (UFF) activity in various locations, its implications and how their participation in global jihadist groups may evolve.”

From the same report*:

“Although they participate in disparate organizations with differing goals, Uighur Foreign Fighters (UFFs) share unique characteristics as a group. Uighurs consider themselves separate and distinct in ethnicity, culture, and religion from the Han Chinese majority that governs them. These distinctions form the basis of the Uighurs’ religious ethno- nationalist identity, leading some of them to engage in violent activities aimed at establishing their own state, East Turkestan. Indeed, over the past two decades, Uighurs have launched several terror attacks in China in pursuit of this goal. Some recent attacks have included:

October 2013: ETIM attack at Tiananmen Square in Beijing kills five.

February 2014: A knife attack at a train station in Kunming kills 30.

April 2014: A knife and bomb attack at the South Railway Station of Urumqi kills three and wounds 79.

May 2014: Two cars crashed into a market and the attackers lobbed explosives, killing 31 people in Urumqi.

September 2014: Bomb blasts (including suicide bombers) and clashes left 50 people dead and 50 injured.

October 2015: A knife attack on a coalmine kills 50.”

 

Suppressing their internal jihadists of course doesn’t bother the Chinese Communist regime one single bit when it comes to capitalizing on the weakness of the Biden administration, while offering support for jihadists outside of China.

In typical shameless fashion, the CCP is playing a great friend to the jihadist Taliban, while genociding its own jihadist Uighurs. This isn’t a problem for the jihadist Taliban either because they don’t care about Muslims. Muslims are expendable to Jihadists. This isn’t anything new. For anyone who has followed closely this issue and knows about the tactics of Muslims on the battlefield, you know they use women and children as human shields all the time. In Israel, to so-called “Palestinians” teach and train their children from early on that the greatest achievement in life is to be a shahid, a suicide bomber who will blow Jews up.

Likewise, so long as the Taliban jihadis can achieve their goal to have political backing by any major power, who cares that innocent Uighurs are getting genocided by their new partners in Beijing.

If you’re still wondering how this can be, yes, this is how insane all these people are. While playing victims, they have gained access to the levers of power in the media, in government, on the international diplomatic scene, in the world of banking, in finance, and in education.

Some critics of Islam take pride in not referring to Muslims in their public presentations of the problem with Islam. Why? When we publicly say that Muslims are called by Muhammad to kill Jews, we are only repeating a well known Sunna. We didn’t create this. This isn’t some slander some critic of Islam invented. There is no other “meaning” of this verse other than what it says: Muslims, you go ahead and be ready to kill Jews.

Why aren’t the Muslims upset about it? I have never heard any Muslim protesting Islam’s teaching MUSLIMS specifically to kill people. Someone upset about it? Why get upset with me? I’m only pointing out to what MUSLIMS are explicitly called to do by Islam. And I’m expected somehow conceal this? Why? It’s what Islam teaches. They believe it. They preach it. But we can’t repeat it?

Sure we can. Here it is: Islam teaches MUSLIMS, not just “some people”, to kill Jews and by extension any other infidel.

Here is the quote if you don’t believe me:

All Muslims believe all their “holy” books. All imams preach this same stuff. All jihadists obey the exact same book and verses. They are all Muslims.

There’s no room for “apples and oranges” spin here. It’s all apples and they are all rotten because Islam is a rotten, genocidal, terrorism generating matrix.

But I better watch myself before I start sounding too islamophobic. We can’t do that, you know. Sensitive leftist souls might get “offended” that Muslims might be getting offended. It’s a complex, offending chain reaction of sorts. Very strange phenomenon that islamophobia is harming people with. Terrible!

Going back to ISIS-K, can you see now how now the Taliban will be cast in positive light and how the media will try to get us all to accept them as a legitimate political regime? In other words, prop a new boogie man called “ISIS-K”? Huh? Who is that? Oh, it’s new bad guys. The Taliban [jihadis] aren’t THAT BAD. See? Before you know it, just like that, the Taliban [jihadis] are the good guys. Thanks, Joe Xiden!

If we had a truly free press, you would be hearing about this from someone much more qualified than me, someone who is getting paid to investigate, and to write for living. Unfortunately for all os, the free press, whatever was left of it, doesn’t exist anymore and you’re stuck with your neighborhood islamophobe stealing time from his lunch break to pull the curtain on this shit show and expose these clowns for what they are: jihadis!

Nothing more, noting less! All of them!

George 
@islamophobenet

*Source: Uighur Foreign Fighters: An Underexamined Jihadist Challenge
Permanent archive on the blockchain: https://kutt.oneinterweb.net/5WFCs8

Joseph Biden isn’t indifferent to how prominent Islam will become in America. This much we know because more than once he made references to Islam during his 2020 presidential campaign. While many commentators are blasting him for his lack of leadership, the argument can be made that he did exactly what he wanted to do: leave Afghanistan to the Taliban in his desire to get the approval of Muslims.

Watch him promise some Muslim girls he will make Islam mainstream in America:

Do you think this audio was leaked randomly? Probably not. This looks much more like a well orchestrated stunt for the purpose of getting Muslims votes.

What else is Biden willing to do in order to combat “islamophobia”?

Heidi Peltier, Director of the “20 Years of War” Project at Boston University’s Pardee Center for the Study of the Longer-Range Future, calculated in January 2020, that the United States Federal Government has spent $6.5 TRILLION on wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Says Ms. Peltier:

Throughout the 18 years the U.S. has been engaged in the “Global War on Terror,” mainly in Iraq and Afghanistan, the government has financed this war by borrowing funds rather than through alternative means such as raising taxes or issuing war bonds. Thus, the costs of the post-9/11 wars include not only the expenses incurred for operations, equipment, and personnel, but also the interest costs on this debt. Since 2001 these interest payments have been growing, resulting in more and more taxpayer dollars being wasted on interest payments rather than being channeled to more productive uses. This paper calculates that the debt incurred for $2 trillion in direct war-related spending by the Department of Defense and State Department has already resulted in cumulative interest payments of $925 billion. Even if military interventions ceased immediately, interest payments would continue to rise, and will grow further as the U.S. continues its current military operations…….

…..

If war spending ceased immediately, interest payments on the $2 trillion of existing war debt would rise to over $2 trillion by 2030 and to $6.5 trillion by 2050.

$6.5 Trillion on the war on terror but refusing to identify the source of this terror?

Was it because America’s leadership became conditioned by global jihad not to offend Islam? Fear of being accused of “Islamophobia”?

Lives have been lost, men and women lost limbs, money was wasted. All because America’s leadership: academia, politicians, military, and ministers, have collectively been refusing to identify the source of this evil that has been plaguing the world since it’s inception in the 7th century – Islam.

You can read the rest of Heidi Peltier’s report here.

French Muslimas are creating fake drama in France over not being able to wear hijabs when they play soccer.

The question is why stop at demanding hijabs only? Why not wear full niqab or burqa? They will be considered even more pleasing to Allah.

What happens if they reach for the ball and they spread their legs sliding on the grass which happens all the time in soccer? What if part of their legs are seen by the crowd? What if the crowd suddenly begins to lust after said soccer player? The imam at the local mosque will be super upset and might have the woman flogged. This would be a very good judgment according to Sharia “law”.

They should definitely go for full body niqabs!

abcnews.go.com/International/hands-off-hijab-french-muslims-rail-ban-religious/story

Recently, popular conservative host Tucker Carlson introduced Victor Orban to his audience. Mr. Orban is the Prime Minister of Hungary, one of the three Central European countries giving leftist totalitarians in the EU a run for their money – at least when it comes to the Union’s multicultural agenda. Victor Orban comes across as a very well spoken, stable and highly intelligent leader who doesn’t shy away from sharing his views on the Left’s insane rush to destroy whatever is left of Western Civilization. [un]Shockingly, the Communist Far Left and the anti-Semitic Far Right have joined forces against him, in a way mirroring the opposition against Donald Trump here in the United States and how he managed to unite the strangest of bedfellows in their hatred of his Pro-America vision.

YOU CAN ALSO LISTEN TO THIS POST

Much can be said about Mr. Orban, who has a been a pro-American ally since the 80’s when he was a vocal opponent of the Communist regime. He is a strong proponent of economic freedom (a.k.a. free market economy), he is pro-family, pro-Christian, and he is definitely opposed to allowing Islamic invaders into his country. The best the Left can do in their attempt to character-assassinate him is to groundlessly accuse him of being a “fascist”. The best global jihad can do is label him an “islamophobe”. Which is what they do with everyone who doesn’t submit to their agenda anyway, so really nothing new to see here.

But Victor Orban isn’t the only European Conservative Prime Minister the world needs to know about.

Meet Sebastian Kurz, Chancellor of Austria.

Mr. Kurz is the youngest head of state in the EU and has been called a “political wunderkind” by friend and foe alike. Not unlike Mr. Orban, Sebastian Kurtz has emerged as a strong Austria-first leader who has openly endorsed Austrian traditional culture, opposed the aggressive LGBTQ agenda, and even had the balls to start shutting down mosques while kicking out imams with proven ties to jihad. Definitely a major “islamophobe” if you ask the jihadis.

Let’s hear him in his own words:

“The EU must focus much more strongly on the problem of political Islam in the future,” Kurz told the German daily Die Welt in an interview. “I hope we will see an end to this misunderstood tolerance and that all countries in Europe will finally realize how dangerous the ideology of political Islam is for our freedom and the European way of life.  The EU must, with utmost determination and unity, wage a war against Islamist terror, but particularly against its political base, that is to say political Islam.””

Wait, what? Did I hear right? A European leader speaks out against Islam and takes a stand for his people?

We’ve talked about Austria before on our podcast, here and here. I encourage you to listen to my interview with Austrian activist Elizabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff. It will give you a pretty good idea as to how deep are the issues when it comes to Europe, freedom of speech and the ongoing islamization thereof. But having someone like Chancellor Kurtz at the helm of the nation that twice defended Europe against the Muslim armies, might be a reason for us to have hope that we haven’t seen the last in this civilizational conflict.

Last not least

Geert Wilders stands tall amongst his peers

even though he’s not an acting head of state. Or at least not yet.

If you haven’t heard about Geert Wilders and you’re wondering why isn’t there anyone in Europe like Winston Churchill who will be willing and able to fight the enemy to the last today and now, there is. His name is Geert Wilders. But don’t wait for this recognition to come from the treacherous EU politicians or the despicable left-wing media. Most likely decades will pass before Europe comes to its senses and realizes what an incredible leader we’ve had in our midst and they didn’t even know it.

Geert Wilders has been in politics for a long time. He trailblazed what today can be called modern European conservatism. From his opposition to Islam and Muslims immigration, to his support for Israel and America, Mr. Wilders is one of a kind. He has poked the terrorist global jihad so deeply in the eye that living a normal life is impossible for him and his family. He lives under 24/7 security protection and his office in Parliament is specially outfitted with anti-terrorist attack features.

Defenders of Western Civilization or ‘Islamophobes’?

Have you wondered why you never hear people like Victor Orban, Sebastian Kurtz and Geert Wilders speak for themselves? Why aren’t their voices being heard? They aren’t the only ones but they are a good example that that even if you become a head of state, the leftist terrorist media will do anything in their power to prevent you from getting your message out. The same was true of Donald Trump and continues to be even more true today after he was demonstratively de-platformed by all almost social media.

The Left despises today’s champions of Liberty. They are terrified by their success.

Are they Defenders of Western Civilization or “Islamophobes”?

I think you know the answer. To those of us who know who we are and who cherish our identity as free people whose liberties come from God, we cheer leaders like Donald Trump, Victor Orban, Sebastian Kurz, and Geert Wilders. We are inspired by leaders who aren’t afraid to speak publicly what the majority of us think, believe and want. We don’t care if the terrorist left will label them or us, their supporters as “Islamophobes”. In fact, it’s about time we begin to wear this label with pride!

George

Ricky Schroder is a great American! He is an actor, producer, and  director with a career spanning 40 years. A man who has chosen the narrow path, and a true freedom-loving patriot. Listen to his impassioned on the day fraudulent usurper Joseph Biden was installed as “President” of the United States: Ricky Schroder is a great American! He is an actor, producer, director with a career spanning 40 years. A man who has chosen the narrow path, and a true freedom-loving patriot. Listen to his impassioned address to the American people on the day fraudulent usurper Joseph Biden was installed as “President” of the United States:

One Grace Brody, Executive Editor of The Michigan Journal of International Law, has published an ode to Sharia Law a shahid would die for!

But no need for anyone to die! The globalists over at The Michigan Journal of International Law, most all of whom look like millennials manufactured by leftist elitist universities, will do the bidding of global jihadists for free. (Well, probably with funding from Soros or Soros-like groups of course but who cares right?).

The Michigan Journal of International Law claims it is now “one of the premiere international legal journals in the world”. If that’s true, we might as well to call a funeral service for the legal profession in Michigan.

Grace Brody, the Executive Editor, has graduated from Yale University with a double major in Linguistics and Modern Middle Eastern studies. She has also gotten her MA from the University of Chicago in Middle East Studies, with a focus on 11th Century Islamic Philosophy.

This explains a lot.

Ms. Brody definitely sees the world exactly how she was probably taught in school by some wide-eyed utopian whose own view of Islam comes from the sanitized version of Islam high academia has been spinning in the West for decades.

Global jihad wants Western useful idiots to see the world as they see it: Muslims are victims and any criticism of Islam as “Islamophobia”.

I hope y’all go to her post and read it. http://www.mjilonline.org/ignorance-of-islam-in-european-approach-to-contract-law/

Then I hope you respectfully ask Ms. Brody the million-dollar question: what exactly is ‘Islamophobia’?

Can this millennial luminary aspiring to “pursue a career in International Arbitration” (from her bio on their website), even give us a definition of ‘Islamophobia’? Is it a health condition as most phobias are? If so, why is a legal mind busying itself with medical issues?

Next, let’s ask her about her the flaming accusation of her post: ignorance of Islam.

She quotes a study conducted by Bertelsmann Stiftung’s Religion Monitor, in which 50% of respondents in Germany and Switzerland said they considered Islam a threat. What is Ms. Brody’s conclusion? Well, they must be ignorant of Islam.

Is that so?

Or could it be that the jihad being waged on Europe by Muslims in recent decades has informed these Germans and Swiss citizens pretty well and in very bloody clear terms what Islam is?

“Unfortunately, it appears that there exists a similar misconception of the religion and its principles within the world of European contract law as well. Specifically, the problem has manifested in a historic refusal among European courts to enforce choice of law provisions which select Islamic law. Although this issue poses less of a day-to-day threat to European Muslims, it reflects a similar fundamental problem of misunderstanding of the religion.”

Grace Brody could have published her piece under even a better title. “Convert now or die” is a candidate. Because you see, all the ‘problems’ she is decrying in her piece, can only be solved if Europe converts to Islam. And we already know that it’s “convert or die” with Islam. This is why they have been focusing on dying us. (Hint-hint: the only people converting to Islam in Europe in larger numbers are hard-core criminals stuck in European jails).

The rest of the article is a hodgepodge collection of European case law examples aimed at shaming the European courts and singing the praises of Islamic Law.

What is Ms. Brody pushing for in fact? It’s what global jihad is pushing for – the replacement of European Law with Sharia Law. Sharia Law is incompatible with the nations whose laws are based on the Judeo-Christian understanding of the law. To Sharia Law what’s priority is jihad. The laws of the civilized world center around their highest value – the life and the rights of individuals. It’s truly an either-or choice. There can’t be a mixing of the two.

Grace Brody ends her embarrassment of a piece with the following lofty statement that could have been ripped from the pages of some ISIS propaganda magazine:

“Thus, we can only hope that the future will hold better understanding of the religion of Islam and the millions of people who practice the faith, both for their safety and security and for their contractual rights.”

Mashallah Grace! Can we talk now about stonings, honor killings, and the clitoral mutilation of little girls in the name of Allah (a.k.a. FGM), still practiced by Muslims and based on that same “religion” and it’s “law”?

George

Editor, Islamophobia Watch

 

1
7

Another day, another grievance manufacturing from the Neo-Marxist Left!

Here is the extended audio version of this commentary on The Islamophobia Watch Podcast: https://anchor.fm/islamophobiawatch/episodes/Ageism—The-Left-Wants-to-Politisize-Age-and-Divide-Us-Even-More-engrsp

“Ageism” seems to be the latest move of the woke culture which is adding yet another ingredient to the Marxist soup of fake grievances they use to entice new followers.

As of “racism” wasn’t enough, here comes “ageism”.

What’s ageism, you might ask. Exactly. Another made up label, another lever in the ever-evolving machine of identity politics.

That’s right, the woke Neo-Marxist Left isn’t sitting around doing nothing.

I assume soon everyone who dislikes their nose, hair type, ear shape, or size of genitalia, will be able to join the ranks of the offended in the Army of the Perpetual Victimhood.

Back to “agism”. The woke Left is working hard to get young people to have a grievance over the fact that older people at work don’t pay them enough respect in the work place.

Are you serious?

Yup.

Young and feeling not respected enough by those older at work, can get you a spot right next to BLM
types ready to torch cities and tear down statues of America’s founding fathers.

You might even get cozy with the “tolerant” LGBTQ division that loves to hate. Not to be forgotten – there’s the Burka-flaunting, praying-five-times-a-day-at-their-workplace Muslims, and who knows who else. It’s hard to keep up with the constantly growing list of grievances the Left manufactures all the time.

One Emma Waldman for example is offering advise to the “victimized” youth over at the Harvard Business Review: https://hbr.org/2020/11/gg-ascend-pub-11-11-how-old-is-old-enough

Here is GlassDoor virtue signaling, too.

https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/glassdoor-survey-finds-three-in-five-us-employees-have-experienced-or-witnessed-discrimination-based-on-age-race-gender-or-lgbtq-identity-at-work-300943513.html

Tension between people from different generations has existed since time began. All kinds of books, operas and movies have been made through the ages looking into this ever-present social dynamic.

There is no formula how relationships between people from different generations can be resolved. As times change, the approach to these dynamics changes, too. Then there are unique cultural frameworks that play part in this as well.

But no, leave it to the Left to politicize EVERY aspect of human life. And by politicizing I mean dividing. That’s what the Left does. They divide and sow enmity because their agenda absolutely needs people feeling angry, bitter and entitled.

Here is the extended audio version of this commentary on The Islamophobia Watch Podcast: https://anchor.fm/islamophobiawatch/episodes/Ageism—The-Left-Wants-to-Politisize-Age-and-Divide-Us-Even-More-engrsp

George