Tag Archive for: Islamophobe

The new CEO of Twitter is most probably a Muslim. He seems to be in support of jihad as well. This is what you are not going to read in any of the headlines popping up on the Interwebs following the news of Jack “Ban Trump” Dorsey stepping down from the CEO role at the far-left activist organization.

AN APOLOGIST FOR JIHAD?

Some publications on the right have correctly raised concerns about where Parang Agrawal sits on the ideological spectrum, pointing out a tweet he posted in 2010 basically trashing white people.

A writer at the Indian website India Today, (probably a Muslim himself), points out that the tweet was quoting Aasif Mandvi from The Daily Show. As if it matters whether it was an original thought or a quote. Aasif Mandi is also a Muslim. And if he was the one who made this statement originally, this tells you all you need to know about where he stands on Jihad as well.

But as bad as Twitter’s Agrawal’s racist remark is about white people, it’s as if no one is noticing what’s equally bad or maybe even worse – this statement is a de-facto apology for Jihad!

“If they are not gonna make a distinction between Muslims and jihadists…”

Parang Agrawal, CEO of Twitter

What is the difference, Mr. Agrawal? Is Twitter allowing a free discussion on the subject matter for us to have different opinions and takes on it, so we can better understand this complex issue? Not at all.

Twitter is banning people like Laura Loomer who criticize Islam but has no problem with pro-Jihadists like Linda Sarsour, Hamas and other terror groups on it. In fact, it has been reported that jihadists probably used Twitter as part of their tech toolkit at the time of the Taliban takeover of Kabul earlier this year. What’s the difference between the Taliban and non-Taliban Afghans? We don’t know. And we’ll never be able to learn if it was up to Twitter because Jack Dorsey, probably under the influence of the Jihadist apologist, now CEO Parang Agrawal.

CLUELESS ‘THEY’ REMAIN

But who are “they” who don’t understand the difference between Muslims and Jihadists? Does he mean all white people? All Westerners? All Americans?

The reality is that people in the US (or the West in general) are still not ‘getting’ what Islam is all about. Not if all they know about Islam comes from the incomplete education most have received when it comes to the true history of Islam. Had the true history of Islam and Jihad been taught proper in Western schools in the last several decades (or even before that), people today wouldn’t be so confused. And they would know that the difference between Jihadists and Muslims who aren’t pursuing Jihad boils down to how much a Muslim adheres to the Islamic doctrine or not. The more dedicated Muslims become to obeying the Islamic doctrine, the closer they match the profile of a terrorist. Furthermore, all Muslims support Jihad because all Mosques send money to Jihadist groups in one way or another.

For example, most Westerners (and people in the world in general) completely lack understanding of the genocide Islam has been perpetrating on India since the 8th century when it first attacked. This Jihad continues on until today. Scholars say that up to 400 million Indians might have been genocided by Muslims since 711 AD.

FOUR HUNDRED MILLION!

How many school books educate students about this part of history?

Don’t expect mainstream Western media to do a due diligence on Parang Agrawal any time soon! They are too busy celebrating his appointment as a great achievement of multiculturalism in the US. Anything and anyone daring to expose him as an apologist of Jihad, will no doubt be labeled as an “islamophobe” (fake far-left, pro-Jihadi propaganda label), banned from Twitter and probably from all other mainstream social media platforms. Could this be the reason conservative websites are playing it safe and are pointing out Agrawal’s anti-white racist remarks but won’t touch the pro-Jihadist element in this same statement? Just saying.

JIHAD IN OCTOBER OF 2010

Parang Agrawal is a tech genius, if the mainstream media is to be believed. Some of us think he’s a diversity hire. Oh, well. Whichever he is, he has access to information. Did he not know how many were the victims of Jihad in 2010 in October alone? According to the most authoritative source on this subject, TheReligionOfPeace.com, there were 121 Jihadist attacks in the first 20 days of October alone of that year alone!

That’s 366 innocent people who were killed by Jihadists and 508 wounded!

In 2010 there were 9,262 innocent people who were killed by Muslims and 17,470 wounded.

Does Parang Agrawal know these facts?

If yes, why is he making apologetic statements for Jihad? Only a Muslim who defends Jihad could think and act like this.

We can therefore make a safe bet that Parang Agrawal is a Muslim, that his wife and family are Muslim, that he was born and raised in a Muslim family and that he went to a Muslim school. Which basically means he has been an apologist for Islam his entire life, he probably has been donating money to Muslims organizations that funnel money to fund jihad, and that he will now use Twitter to extend these same influences in the United States and around the world.

Jack Dorsey has said that “Parag has been behind every critical decision that helped turn this company around.” This means he was behind the decision to ban Donald Trump, to allow Jihadists on Twitter and the banning of conservatives.

And now this same guy, a Muslim and an apologist of Islamic Jihad, is the CEO of one of the most influential US tech companies.

Orwell himself would be scratching his head if he was able to hear from the grave what the once great West has been turning into.

3
2

The propagandists are at it again! The other day it was the “Taliban”.

Today it’s “ISIS-K”!

Thirteen Marines were just killed, dozens others have been injured, but the media is busy throwing at us new, fancy code words in their desperate last effort to conceal the truth: Jihadist all over the world are out to destroy us in the name of the same book, the same non-existent “deity”, and the same 7th century murderous, child-raping goat herder, if he ever existed.

In Nigeria they call them the “Fulani”. In Myanmar they are the “Rohingya”. In China it’s the “Uighur”. In Israel it’s the “Palestinians”.

Stop the spin! Enough propaganda and mind games!

They are all cut from the same cloth. They are all Muslims and they are all part of the agenda of global jihad.

This is the truth the globalist propaganda machine doesn’t want you to hear. Why? Because they don’t want you to connect the dots. They want to be the sole authority on this subject matter and they definitely want to control the narrative. They want you dependent on their “experts”, talking heads, government spokesmen and don’t forget, their “journalists”. They are on somebody’s payroll and their job is to translate and interpret for you how Islam is all about peace. Even when they are chopping hands and heads off.

They are terrified at the prospects of you and I figuring out the simple and most obvious fact: Jihad, produced exclusively by the matrix of Islam, is one of the greatest existential threats to the civilized world as we know it.

Stop the spin! Enough propaganda and mind games!

They are all cut from the same cloth. They are all Muslims and they are all part of the agenda of global jihad.

 

Oh, no! But we thought the Uighur were all innocent victims of China’s genocide?

Yes, I know. I knew this would come up in the minds of most people the minute I decided to list them as part of the gang.

Sorry to burst yet another one of your propaganda bubble, jihadists!

The truth is that all of these groups with quirky names are fundamentally stemming from the same root, they are part of the same agenda, the obey the same terrorist manual, they worship the same 7th century pedophile – if he ever even existed.

That’s right, the Uighurs aren’t the innocent martyrs the jihadist narrative controlled media would have you believe.

Now, I’m sure the Chinese are killing innocents among the Uighur. After all, the ruthless Chinese Communists have been killing tens of millions of innocents of their own people, let alone the Uighur.

But why isn’t “the media”, i.e. the despicable clowns who fabricate stories meant to confuse you, why are aren’t they telling us the full story on the Uighur?

According to a report* by Colin P. Clarke, Ph.D. in international security policy from the University of Pittsburgh, and Paul Rexton Kan, Associate Professor of National Security Studies and the Henry L. Stimson Chair of Military Studies at the US Army War College, the Uighur story has a “little” more to it than what you’ve been led to believe.

“Uighurs, specifically individuals of Turkic decent from China’s northwest province of Xinjiang, have become a noticeable part of the constellation of globally active jihadist terror groups. Uighur jihadists first came to the world’s attention when the United States and its allies invaded Afghanistan in 2001. While continuing their cooperation with the Taliban under the banner of the East Turkestan Islamic Movement (ETIM), Uighur jihadists have now spread to Southeast Asia and the Middle East. ETIM’s members are part of the Turkestan Islamic Party fighting with the Al-Qaeda umbrella group in Syria, but other Uighurs have joined IS in Syria and Iraq, and still others have joined local terror groups in Indonesia. However, Uighurs are currently underexamined as active participants in jihadist organizations. Publications about Uighurs have been piecemeal – focusing on their struggles against the Chinese government or narrowly describing the specific groups in which Uighurs have been participants. This Policy Brief explores the scope and scale of Uighur Foreign Fighters (UFF) activity in various locations, its implications and how their participation in global jihadist groups may evolve.”

From the same report*:

“Although they participate in disparate organizations with differing goals, Uighur Foreign Fighters (UFFs) share unique characteristics as a group. Uighurs consider themselves separate and distinct in ethnicity, culture, and religion from the Han Chinese majority that governs them. These distinctions form the basis of the Uighurs’ religious ethno- nationalist identity, leading some of them to engage in violent activities aimed at establishing their own state, East Turkestan. Indeed, over the past two decades, Uighurs have launched several terror attacks in China in pursuit of this goal. Some recent attacks have included:

October 2013: ETIM attack at Tiananmen Square in Beijing kills five.

February 2014: A knife attack at a train station in Kunming kills 30.

April 2014: A knife and bomb attack at the South Railway Station of Urumqi kills three and wounds 79.

May 2014: Two cars crashed into a market and the attackers lobbed explosives, killing 31 people in Urumqi.

September 2014: Bomb blasts (including suicide bombers) and clashes left 50 people dead and 50 injured.

October 2015: A knife attack on a coalmine kills 50.”

 

Suppressing their internal jihadists of course doesn’t bother the Chinese Communist regime one single bit when it comes to capitalizing on the weakness of the Biden administration, while offering support for jihadists outside of China.

In typical shameless fashion, the CCP is playing a great friend to the jihadist Taliban, while genociding its own jihadist Uighurs. This isn’t a problem for the jihadist Taliban either because they don’t care about Muslims. Muslims are expendable to Jihadists. This isn’t anything new. For anyone who has followed closely this issue and knows about the tactics of Muslims on the battlefield, you know they use women and children as human shields all the time. In Israel, to so-called “Palestinians” teach and train their children from early on that the greatest achievement in life is to be a shahid, a suicide bomber who will blow Jews up.

Likewise, so long as the Taliban jihadis can achieve their goal to have political backing by any major power, who cares that innocent Uighurs are getting genocided by their new partners in Beijing.

If you’re still wondering how this can be, yes, this is how insane all these people are. While playing victims, they have gained access to the levers of power in the media, in government, on the international diplomatic scene, in the world of banking, in finance, and in education.

Some critics of Islam take pride in not referring to Muslims in their public presentations of the problem with Islam. Why? When we publicly say that Muslims are called by Muhammad to kill Jews, we are only repeating a well known Sunna. We didn’t create this. This isn’t some slander some critic of Islam invented. There is no other “meaning” of this verse other than what it says: Muslims, you go ahead and be ready to kill Jews.

Why aren’t the Muslims upset about it? I have never heard any Muslim protesting Islam’s teaching MUSLIMS specifically to kill people. Someone upset about it? Why get upset with me? I’m only pointing out to what MUSLIMS are explicitly called to do by Islam. And I’m expected somehow conceal this? Why? It’s what Islam teaches. They believe it. They preach it. But we can’t repeat it?

Sure we can. Here it is: Islam teaches MUSLIMS, not just “some people”, to kill Jews and by extension any other infidel.

Here is the quote if you don’t believe me:

All Muslims believe all their “holy” books. All imams preach this same stuff. All jihadists obey the exact same book and verses. They are all Muslims.

There’s no room for “apples and oranges” spin here. It’s all apples and they are all rotten because Islam is a rotten, genocidal, terrorism generating matrix.

But I better watch myself before I start sounding too islamophobic. We can’t do that, you know. Sensitive leftist souls might get “offended” that Muslims might be getting offended. It’s a complex, offending chain reaction of sorts. Very strange phenomenon that islamophobia is harming people with. Terrible!

Going back to ISIS-K, can you see now how now the Taliban will be cast in positive light and how the media will try to get us all to accept them as a legitimate political regime? In other words, prop a new boogie man called “ISIS-K”? Huh? Who is that? Oh, it’s new bad guys. The Taliban [jihadis] aren’t THAT BAD. See? Before you know it, just like that, the Taliban [jihadis] are the good guys. Thanks, Joe Xiden!

If we had a truly free press, you would be hearing about this from someone much more qualified than me, someone who is getting paid to investigate, and to write for living. Unfortunately for all os, the free press, whatever was left of it, doesn’t exist anymore and you’re stuck with your neighborhood islamophobe stealing time from his lunch break to pull the curtain on this shit show and expose these clowns for what they are: jihadis!

Nothing more, noting less! All of them!

George 
@islamophobenet

*Source: Uighur Foreign Fighters: An Underexamined Jihadist Challenge
Permanent archive on the blockchain: https://kutt.oneinterweb.net/5WFCs8

Recently, popular conservative host Tucker Carlson introduced Victor Orban to his audience. Mr. Orban is the Prime Minister of Hungary, one of the three Central European countries giving leftist totalitarians in the EU a run for their money – at least when it comes to the Union’s multicultural agenda. Victor Orban comes across as a very well spoken, stable and highly intelligent leader who doesn’t shy away from sharing his views on the Left’s insane rush to destroy whatever is left of Western Civilization. [un]Shockingly, the Communist Far Left and the anti-Semitic Far Right have joined forces against him, in a way mirroring the opposition against Donald Trump here in the United States and how he managed to unite the strangest of bedfellows in their hatred of his Pro-America vision.

YOU CAN ALSO LISTEN TO THIS POST

Much can be said about Mr. Orban, who has a been a pro-American ally since the 80’s when he was a vocal opponent of the Communist regime. He is a strong proponent of economic freedom (a.k.a. free market economy), he is pro-family, pro-Christian, and he is definitely opposed to allowing Islamic invaders into his country. The best the Left can do in their attempt to character-assassinate him is to groundlessly accuse him of being a “fascist”. The best global jihad can do is label him an “islamophobe”. Which is what they do with everyone who doesn’t submit to their agenda anyway, so really nothing new to see here.

But Victor Orban isn’t the only European Conservative Prime Minister the world needs to know about.

Meet Sebastian Kurz, Chancellor of Austria.

Mr. Kurz is the youngest head of state in the EU and has been called a “political wunderkind” by friend and foe alike. Not unlike Mr. Orban, Sebastian Kurtz has emerged as a strong Austria-first leader who has openly endorsed Austrian traditional culture, opposed the aggressive LGBTQ agenda, and even had the balls to start shutting down mosques while kicking out imams with proven ties to jihad. Definitely a major “islamophobe” if you ask the jihadis.

Let’s hear him in his own words:

“The EU must focus much more strongly on the problem of political Islam in the future,” Kurz told the German daily Die Welt in an interview. “I hope we will see an end to this misunderstood tolerance and that all countries in Europe will finally realize how dangerous the ideology of political Islam is for our freedom and the European way of life.  The EU must, with utmost determination and unity, wage a war against Islamist terror, but particularly against its political base, that is to say political Islam.””

Wait, what? Did I hear right? A European leader speaks out against Islam and takes a stand for his people?

We’ve talked about Austria before on our podcast, here and here. I encourage you to listen to my interview with Austrian activist Elizabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff. It will give you a pretty good idea as to how deep are the issues when it comes to Europe, freedom of speech and the ongoing islamization thereof. But having someone like Chancellor Kurtz at the helm of the nation that twice defended Europe against the Muslim armies, might be a reason for us to have hope that we haven’t seen the last in this civilizational conflict.

Last not least

Geert Wilders stands tall amongst his peers

even though he’s not an acting head of state. Or at least not yet.

If you haven’t heard about Geert Wilders and you’re wondering why isn’t there anyone in Europe like Winston Churchill who will be willing and able to fight the enemy to the last today and now, there is. His name is Geert Wilders. But don’t wait for this recognition to come from the treacherous EU politicians or the despicable left-wing media. Most likely decades will pass before Europe comes to its senses and realizes what an incredible leader we’ve had in our midst and they didn’t even know it.

Geert Wilders has been in politics for a long time. He trailblazed what today can be called modern European conservatism. From his opposition to Islam and Muslims immigration, to his support for Israel and America, Mr. Wilders is one of a kind. He has poked the terrorist global jihad so deeply in the eye that living a normal life is impossible for him and his family. He lives under 24/7 security protection and his office in Parliament is specially outfitted with anti-terrorist attack features.

Defenders of Western Civilization or ‘Islamophobes’?

Have you wondered why you never hear people like Victor Orban, Sebastian Kurtz and Geert Wilders speak for themselves? Why aren’t their voices being heard? They aren’t the only ones but they are a good example that that even if you become a head of state, the leftist terrorist media will do anything in their power to prevent you from getting your message out. The same was true of Donald Trump and continues to be even more true today after he was demonstratively de-platformed by all almost social media.

The Left despises today’s champions of Liberty. They are terrified by their success.

Are they Defenders of Western Civilization or “Islamophobes”?

I think you know the answer. To those of us who know who we are and who cherish our identity as free people whose liberties come from God, we cheer leaders like Donald Trump, Victor Orban, Sebastian Kurz, and Geert Wilders. We are inspired by leaders who aren’t afraid to speak publicly what the majority of us think, believe and want. We don’t care if the terrorist left will label them or us, their supporters as “Islamophobes”. In fact, it’s about time we begin to wear this label with pride!

George

About Alexis de Tocqueville on Islam

He was one of the most interesting French intellectuals of his time. But his lifework transcended both him and his era. According to Encyclopedia Britannica Alexis de Tocqueville was “a political scientist, historian, and politician, best known for Democracy in America, 4 vol. (1835–40), a perceptive analysis of the political and social system of the United States in the early 19th century.”

His books are part of the curriculum of numerous schools. Democracy in America is very interesting, enlightening, funny, entertaining, and prescient in some ways.

But in the Tocqueville Reader, which includes not only his major writing but also travel notes, letters, conversations with ministers and politicians, as well as diary entries not originally intended for the public, De Tocqueville tells us exactly what he thought about Islam.

Today he would be labeled as an “Islamophobe” by our brainwashed neo-Marxist academics, media, and government:Placeholder

“I studied the Quran a great deal. I came away from that study with the conviction that by and large there have been few religions in the world as deadly to men as that of Muhammad. So far as I can see, it is the principal cause of the decadence so visible today in the Muslim world and, though less absurd than the polytheism of old, its social and political tendencies are in my opinion more to be feared, and I therefore regard it as a form of decadence rather than a form of progress in relation to paganism itself.”

How many schools today will recommend this reading to their students? How many politicians will have the courage to read these words from the platform they have been given by their constituents? How many journalists will agree to hosting a live debate between a jihadi apologist and jihadi scholar who is pro-America and pro-Western civilization?

What has happened to the people of the free world? It’s almost as if we have less freedom of thought and definitely less freedom of speech than a 19th century Frenchman?

Or should I say a French “Islamophobe”?

In light of the stolen 2020 presidential elections and the collapse of public trust in the rule of law in America by more than 80 million pro-Trump voters, what option do we have going forward but to do our best to draw a line in the sand and recruit as many as possible on the side of Liberty? The days are coming when we will need to know exactly who are the talkers and who are the doers when it comes to reclaiming America. This process has already begun. The betrayal of President Trump by his own party, by the Vice President and even by the Supreme Court, was nothing short of a tragic but in a way necessary part of the process of revealing the true condition of the country.

We now have to consolidate and purge our ranks from false “patriots”, false “churches” and other false authority figures. When clarity comes, strength is restored.

I see Islamophobia Watch as a tool in drawing the proverbial line in the sand. Speaking the truth about Islam is part of the test we need to be aware of. If someone is too cowardly to speak up about the true nature of Islam, including its history, they shouldn’t be trusted or allowed to have influence. Normally, this public vetting process would be part of the job of the media. However, the media is completely compromised. In fact, they are part of the propaganda machine.  

So in a way it’s up to citizen projects such as IW to facilitate these opportunities for people to learn about where our leaders stand on this critical issue.

Signup for our newsletter to get updates from Islamophobia Watch

President Trump passed the test. He spoke in no unclear terms about the danger of jihad. Now it’s our turn to do that.

Follow me on GAB and Telegram, the leading censorship-free platforms in the world today. We are building a movement that nothing will be able to stop when the right time comes. And we need to know who are the real and who are the fake defenders of Liberty.

The free world will be free again and we are going to be part of making sure this happens!

George