Michigan Law Journal Editor Pushing Islamic Law
One Grace Brody, Executive Editor of The Michigan Journal of International Law, has published an ode to Sharia Law a shahid would die for!
But no need for anyone to die! The globalists over at The Michigan Journal of International Law, most all of whom look like millennials manufactured by leftist elitist universities, will do the bidding of global jihadists for free. (Well, probably with funding from Soros or Soros-like groups of course but who cares right?).
The Michigan Journal of International Law claims it is now “one of the premiere international legal journals in the world”. If that’s true, we might as well to call a funeral service for the legal profession in Michigan.
Grace Brody, the Executive Editor, has graduated from Yale University with a double major in Linguistics and Modern Middle Eastern studies. She has also gotten her MA from the University of Chicago in Middle East Studies, with a focus on 11th Century Islamic Philosophy.
This explains a lot.
Ms. Brody definitely sees the world exactly how she was probably taught in school by some wide-eyed utopian whose own view of Islam comes from the sanitized version of Islam high academia has been spinning in the West for decades.
Global jihad wants Western useful idiots to see the world as they see it: Muslims are victims and any criticism of Islam as “Islamophobia”.
I hope y’all go to her post and read it. http://www.mjilonline.org/ignorance-of-islam-in-european-approach-to-contract-law/
Then I hope you respectfully ask Ms. Brody the million-dollar question: what exactly is ‘Islamophobia’?
Can this millennial luminary aspiring to “pursue a career in International Arbitration” (from her bio on their website), even give us a definition of ‘Islamophobia’? Is it a health condition as most phobias are? If so, why is a legal mind busying itself with medical issues?
Next, let’s ask her about her the flaming accusation of her post: ignorance of Islam.
She quotes a study conducted by Bertelsmann Stiftung’s Religion Monitor, in which 50% of respondents in Germany and Switzerland said they considered Islam a threat. What is Ms. Brody’s conclusion? Well, they must be ignorant of Islam.
Is that so?
Or could it be that the jihad being waged on Europe by Muslims in recent decades has informed these Germans and Swiss citizens pretty well and in very bloody clear terms what Islam is?
“Unfortunately, it appears that there exists a similar misconception of the religion and its principles within the world of European contract law as well. Specifically, the problem has manifested in a historic refusal among European courts to enforce choice of law provisions which select Islamic law. Although this issue poses less of a day-to-day threat to European Muslims, it reflects a similar fundamental problem of misunderstanding of the religion.”
Grace Brody could have published her piece under even a better title. “Convert now or die” is a candidate. Because you see, all the ‘problems’ she is decrying in her piece, can only be solved if Europe converts to Islam. And we already know that it’s “convert or die” with Islam. This is why they have been focusing on dying us. (Hint-hint: the only people converting to Islam in Europe in larger numbers are hard-core criminals stuck in European jails).
The rest of the article is a hodgepodge collection of European case law examples aimed at shaming the European courts and singing the praises of Islamic Law.
What is Ms. Brody pushing for in fact? It’s what global jihad is pushing for – the replacement of European Law with Sharia Law. Sharia Law is incompatible with the nations whose laws are based on the Judeo-Christian understanding of the law. To Sharia Law what’s priority is jihad. The laws of the civilized world center around their highest value – the life and the rights of individuals. It’s truly an either-or choice. There can’t be a mixing of the two.
Grace Brody ends her embarrassment of a piece with the following lofty statement that could have been ripped from the pages of some ISIS propaganda magazine:
“Thus, we can only hope that the future will hold better understanding of the religion of Islam and the millions of people who practice the faith, both for their safety and security and for their contractual rights.”
Mashallah Grace! Can we talk now about stonings, honor killings, and the clitoral mutilation of little girls in the name of Allah (a.k.a. FGM), still practiced by Muslims and based on that same “religion” and it’s “law”?
Editor, Islamophobia Watch
What a crock! These Leftist women have an underlying need to be dominated by totalitarian ideologies, or is it self hate? Or both? Sick!
So I did reply to her post:
What exactly is your definition of ‘Islamophobia’? Why are you defending Sharia law which commands Muslims to wage jihad against the infidel until they convert to Islam or are killed if they refuse? I am confused and perhaps you can help me understand why you are defending a system where honor killings, pedophelia, child marriages, rape, sex slavery, beheadings and female genital mutilation are completely normative and acceptable behaviors for Muslims?
Are you Jewish? Brody is a Jewish name. If you are Jewish, why do you defend Muslims who are commanded to kill Jews and have done so for 1400 years? Do you really think that if you write in support of Sharia Law that you’ll be saved when America becomes an Islamic nation which is their goal? Just curious as I am Jewish and I know our history with Islam.
Have you seen this article? https://islamophobia.watch/michigan-law-journal-editor-pushing-islamic-law/
What do you have to say about it?
I look forward to your responses!
Awesome 👏👍🏻Let’s hope Grace gets a wake up call maybe?